Less intelligent Prabhupada
Introduction
When Caitanya Caran recently called Prabhupada less intelligent because he translated Bhagavad-gita in a wrong way, we were all in wonder, we couldnât understand where did he get that idea from. We were even more petrified when we saw that he got away with it.
If you read this testimony from Radha Madhava das from Alacua, everything becomes clear. Caitanya Caran attacked Prabhupada because he follows his guruâs line of thought, and he got away with it, because he was protected by most powerful guru in ISKCON. Nobody dares to do anything against Radhanath Swamiâs will, nobody dares to punish his disciples because he is too powerful.
As Radhanath Swami continues to grow his clone army, we can expect more insults to Prabhupada, and we can expect more glorification of Ramesh baba, and more eye camps. And what Prabhupada said no longer matters:
âIn Bhagavad-gita there is no such statement that you take care of the eyes of the people. There is no such statement. That is your manufactured idea.â (Room Conversation â January 8, 1977, Bombay)
Here you have it folks, Radhanath baba is building exact ISKCON as you wanted it to be, movement where Prabhupada is insulted because he is not politically correct, and where Ramesh baba is glorified as saint. Enjoy the party, just donât count me in.
Testimony by Radha Madhava das

Radha Madhava das
In 2007 I was one time riding in a car with Radhanath Swami. I was his close disciple and figured I should take the opportunity to ask him important questions. My mother is a Srila Prabhupada disciple and when she found her favorite verse in Bhagavad-Gita had been changed, she approached Ravindra Swarupa the GBC where she was. He said âOh yes, the GBC approached me to edit it. I didnât feel qualified so I gave it to Jayadvaita as he was the closest thing I knew to a fundamentalist and I figured he wouldnât change anything.â My mother Maralee Mrgaksi Ash was livid, âYou did WHAT to our spiritual masters books?â â that was in 1996. In 2007 my brother-in-law was working as the copyrights officer for the BBTI â and would give their arguments from BBT Edit etc. on why the edits were bonafide. So hearing both sides of this debate â whether changes to Srila Prabhupadaâs books were bonafide or not â I thought to ask Radhanath Swami his opinion.
He saw that I was leaning more towards the âno-changesâ position, and so he said that I should have a balanced perspective and hear from both sides â that Jayadvaita has a clean public record â intimating that his detractors may not â and that he trusted him. He said that the BBTI was trustworthy because they wouldnât change even reasonable things like âwomen are less intelligentâ â Radhanath Swami was part of a proposal to change all instances of âwomen are less intelligentâ to be more politically correct. He said that in seeking to get his own biography published he was dealing with an editor from Penguin Publishing (a prominent publisher) and by reading his book she became vegetarian and started chanting Hare Krishna. Then someone gave her Srila Prabhupadaâs Bhagavad-Gita As It Is and she came across the part where it says âwomen are less intelligentâ and she closed the book and told Radhanath Swami that âYour Guru is a sexistâ and gave up the practices she had taken up. Radhanath Swami then went on to say that he felt in his heart that Srila Prabhupada would change the way he said things so as not to put off âgood quality peopleâ like this woman. He said that things like âwomen are less intelligentâ are temporary material considerations that could be said differently to attract more followers. And this was his evidence that the BBTI was trustworthy to not change Srila Prabhupadaâs books because they would not accept such a sound and reasonable change as he was suggesting.
I thought of my mother who when she first came across the âwomen are less intelligentâ part in Nectar of Devotion, became so furious that she threw the book across the room â then she thought âthat was silly â in the paragraph before that he said that we are not these bodies â so if I am upset that women are less intelligent, Iâm thinking that Iâm a woman, which is really less intelligent.â so she picked up the book, kept reading and became an initiated disciple of Srila Prabhupada. That was the most intelligent thing to do.
So after this exchange with Radhanath Swami, I started losing faith in him as my spiritual master â because he didnât know what to do or what not to do â his motives were for fame and influence â he felt his own ideas superseded Srila Prabhupadaâs words â he felt better than Srila Prabhupada â and so had the nerve to propose editing his books to better suit his own agendas. When I was living in the Bhakti Center in NYC I was told by the management that they actively donât display or distribute Srila Prabhupadaâs books as they offend people who then go away. First they distribute Radhanath Swamiâs books and later once people are ready they introduce Srila Prabhupadaâs books with apologetics for the controversial things he says.
âA guru who does not know what to do and what not to do, but by mistake, by mistakenly I have accepted somebody as guru, he can be rejected. By rejecting him, you can accept an actual bona fide guru.â â Srila Prabhupada lecture August 5th 1973
The true disciple changes their own life to fit the order of the spiritual master â a false disciple changes the order of the spiritual master to fit their own life.
Later on Radhanath Swami defended a child abuser who preyed upon my family â as well as himself was confirmed by victims I know to have been a sexual abuser to them when they were children as well. That put a lot of things in perspective which fit my experience. When others heard my experience they have said that their experiences and suspicions were also confirmed.
Due to fear of social repercussion I didnât let on my experience, but now Iâm not afraid to share my story and to renounce any connection with Radhanath Swami. I have reverted back to my birth name Radha Madhava Dasa.
I pray that others may benefit from my sharing and avoid his presence âas much as milk touched by the lips of a serpent causes poisonous effect.â
There is much more to my experience and anyone can message me for more information. Anyone who feels uncomfortable with this can talk with me or other former disciples and verify for themselves. Itâs nothing to be ashamed of â to have been cheated is not a fault â rather those who cheat others must carry the shame.
Distinguishing truth from illusion is devotional service, however inconvenient it may be.
I felt compelled to share this today as it perfectly fits what Swarup Hebel prabhu just shared and a following comment with Radhanath Swamiâs photo someone posted.
Post by Swarup Hebel:
This is a rewrite of something I posted in the past:
Throughout the years I am noticing more and more an undercurrent of confusion, consternation and even criticism concerning some of the (so-called) controversial statements found in Srila Prabhupadaâs writings as well as in transcripts of classes and conversations. Let me say this about that.
The serious student of Krishna consciousness â the genuine surrendered disciple or follower of Prabhupada â is one who has reached a stage of feeling fed up with, disgusted and disillusioned with life in the material world. Sastra defines this as being materially exhausted. Such a person who is ready, willing and eager to render submissive aural reception will have no problem whatsoever with anything spoken or written by the authorized representative spiritual master who is disseminating knowledge of the absolute truth.
On the other hand the person who still loves the world and who continues to identify with the body may feel squeamish, offended, and bothered by certain statements about âdelicateâ issues. Youâll hear those folks with their lukewarm faith saying:
âOh, Prabhupada could not have meant that.â
âIt must be due to the culture he was coming from.â
âWe have to hide or change the words so theyâre palatable.â
âThis is not politically correct â it will turn people off.â
âImpossible! He couldnât have meant that. Thereâs some mistake.â
If you are looking for a warm fuzzy feeling and a philosophy that is politically correct and dripping with honey-combed sentiment then youâre in the wrong shop, my friend. Try the market down the street.
Srila Prabhupada was not interested in being politically correct. He had no interest in watering down the truth or compromising. He could have set the bar low enough to attract large numbers of disciples and followers but he didnât do that. He set the standards very high and spoke the truth â the absolute truth. If a person is not yet ready to accept it all thatâs alright. Take what you want and leave the rest but please donât cause a big uproar and turn his words into controversial discussions that go endlessly on and on.
Personally, I have been struggling for decades to grab onto that bar and I keep slipping ⌠falling on my face ⌠breaking every bone in my body. I rub chalk on my hands to get a firmer grip but I fall off again and again. So what shall I do? Should I lower the bar to make myself feel better? âOh look â I can do pull ups and chin ups. Itâs so easy.â No! I donât want something cheap. I want the real thing. Letâs keep it real and please letâs not play fast and loose with the words spoken and written by His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada who came a long way and sacrificed everything fifty years ago to deliver the absolute truth, as it is
Conclusion
Here you have it boys, do you want to be follower of fake Radhanath baba who is working behind the scenes to replace Prabhupadaâs philosophy with his own? Then join the clone army of his disciples and followers. But you have to believe, and you have to believe strongly in your dark lord Radhanath Swami. I myself and my small crew of Prabhupadaâs followers will be more than happy to make your life miserable.
And what will happen when you join Radhanathâs clone army? You will a lead boring life of a worthless coward. Just look at Jvalamukhiâs video post where she seriously accuses Radhanath for negligence and cover up of abuse, out of hundreds of comments, there is no a single Radhanath follower on that thread who is defending his guru. Why? Because it is below their level to talk to âoffendersâ. đ đ đ đ
BTW, what are you doing on my website, you know very well that by visiting my website, you will go to hell. đ đ Stay safe, never visit my website again, this is the only way to develop Ramesh prema. đ đ
And if you come to my website because you are smelling the truth, then there is hope for you to become follower of Krishnaâs personal friend called Srila Prabhupada, who was eating new age-mayavadi preachers for breakfast, and whose every word was a pure poetry and absolutely correct in all times and places.
Resources:
- original post location: https://www.facebook.com/radhamadhava11/posts/10155212211427265
- post by Swarup Hebel: https://www.facebook.com/SwarupaDas/posts/1683689878311801